Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Xeon E5-2643 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 669 days newer than Xeon E5-2643 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 123 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 91 vs 130 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2643 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2643 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
628
44.256518675123324%
Multi-Core
3278
81.70488534396809%
Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
