Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 is 180 days older than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Performs up to 5% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Pentium G645T - 234 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2640
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
