Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3964 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 95 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 43% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-2640 - 298 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 150 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |