Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 is 651 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 90 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
