Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 2557 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 90 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 22% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 211 vs 173 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1040
45.25674499564839%
Multi-Core
5400
54.03782647853498%
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
