Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 15% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 546 vs 473 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 65 vs 90 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 90 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
