Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 848 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Consumes up to 1% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 90 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 160 vs 155 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
160
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$482.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$482.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |