Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600T outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600T is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600T
- Performs up to 8% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 239 vs 221 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-13600T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1040
44.14261460101868%
Multi-Core
5400
43.98468681273927%
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 90 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
