Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10210U outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10210U is 1808 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10210U - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10210U
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 127 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 15 vs 90 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-10210U
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-10210U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 21st, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.6 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 90 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
