Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 is 829 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Celeron G550 - 196 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 65 vs 90 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
37.019230769230774%
Multi-Core
629
11.648148148148147%
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 90 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
