Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 91 days older than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 116 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
