Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 33% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 189 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-13700KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
386
13.370280568063734%
Multi-Core
2325
13.205725320913325%
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
