Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500T outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6500T is 669 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500T
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 155 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
155
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$310.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$310.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14496 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-6500T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |