Buy on Amazon
CA$799
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 41% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 161 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
161
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$799
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD RYZEN 9 7950X3D, Without Cooler
Buy for CA$799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
