Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7940HS is 3434 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
- Performs up to 70% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 235 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
138
58.723404255319146%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 7940HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
426
17.246963562753038%
Multi-Core
2198
18.905900567693102%
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 60 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
