Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7845HX is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 289 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 55 vs 60 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
426
16.08761329305136%
Multi-Core
2198
15.961077626897103%
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 60 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
