Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 1213 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 21% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-2630 - 168 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$122.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
440
39.603960396039604%
Multi-Core
2411
79.75521005623553%
Intel Xeon E5-2630 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |