Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 85 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 149 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
149
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$720
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$720 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |