Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14600 is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600
- Performs up to 22% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 189 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E5-2630 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-14600
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
487
18.13780260707635%
Multi-Core
2427
18.039244834250038%
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 14 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
