Key Differences
In short — Core i7-940 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-940 is 1205 days older than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon E5-2620 - 183 vs 182 FPS
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-940
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
