Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1338 days newer than Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-2300 - 154 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-2300 - 85 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
150
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$44.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$44.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-2300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
85 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |