Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 358 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 240 vs 236 FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 51 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
85 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |