Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 1842 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 8% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 225 vs 208 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 3500X
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
926
59.54983922829582%
Multi-Core
3996
68.3076923076923%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell-E | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
