Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1874 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 43% better in Far Cry 6 than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 130 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
130
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$659
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$659 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15341 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |