Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3047 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 31% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 238 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$187.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65828 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
416
19.091326296466267%
Multi-Core
2118
23.940318752119364%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |