Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is 3616 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- Performs up to 39% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 158 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 55 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Mobile • Jul 27th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
416
14.767483138090167%
Multi-Core
2118
12.848043676069153%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
