Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 37% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 126 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
126
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$350.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$350.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
85 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |