Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600 is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 288 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-13600
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
569
23.3483791546984%
Multi-Core
2519
20.281803542673106%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 14 |
| 6 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
