Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500T outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13500T is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500T
- Performs up to 26% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 148 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-13500T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
569
25.03299604047514%
Multi-Core
2519
26.305346700083543%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13500T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 14 |
| 6 | Threads | 20 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
