Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2609 v3 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2609 v3 is 1303 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 54 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65591 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
569
92.37012987012987%
Multi-Core
2519
100%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
85 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |