Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7940HS is 3062 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
- Performs up to 13% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 132 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 9 7940HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
569
23.036437246963562%
Multi-Core
2519
21.66695338035438%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
