Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 8640U outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 8640U is 3376 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- Performs up to 63% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 235 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 28 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 8640U
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
569
22.925060435132956%
Multi-Core
2519
28.72619454897936%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
