Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3138 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 80 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 194 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$619.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$619.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57744 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
350
13.001485884101042%
Multi-Core
998
6.1517598471306165%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |