Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1495 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 121 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 6 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |