Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4712MQ outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4712MQ is 335 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4712MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4712MQ
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2420 - 236 vs 228 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 37 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Intel Core i7-4712MQ |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 14th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 37 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |