Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700U is 1953 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Performs up to 5% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 197 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2420 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2420 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
433
48.92655367231639%
Multi-Core
2148
84.07045009784736%
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
