Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1318 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 173 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
173
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |