Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9980HK outperforms Xeon E5-1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9980HK is 2604 days newer than Xeon E5-1650.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9980HK
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-1650 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 | vs | Intel Core i9-9980HK |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 45 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |