Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 2115 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 140 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 8% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 232 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
43.83358098068351%
Multi-Core
5480
33.7792023670098%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
