Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v2 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v2 is 699 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-4100 - 112 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |