Buy on Amazon
CA$38
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1274 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-1620 - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
118
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80662G4400 Pentium Processor G4400, 3.3 GHz
Buy for CA$38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
