Buy on Amazon
CA$185.8
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $278
Availability
MSRP in USD: $278
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 54 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-1620 - 193 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 77 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
193
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$185.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770
Buy for CA$185.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
