Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3681 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 30% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-1620 - 144 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 16 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |