Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Pentium G4560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 197 days older than Pentium G4560.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 5% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Pentium G4560 - 136 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
707
64.98161764705883%
Multi-Core
1452
37.24987172909184%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
