Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Pentium G3460 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 700 days newer than Pentium G3460.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 15% better in Starfield than Pentium G3460 - 53 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3460 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3460
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Pentium G3460
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G3460
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
613
56.341911764705884%
Multi-Core
1044
26.782965623396613%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Pentium G3460 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
