Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 2477 days newer than Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 9% better in Remnant II than Core i7-860 - 85 vs 78 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$70.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77510 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |