Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1589 days newer than Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-3820 - 127 vs 120 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 130 vs 140 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
