Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2290 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 24% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 169 vs 136 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i7-13700K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
38.309859154929576%
Multi-Core
3898
22.133893589234003%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
