Buy on Amazon
CA$235.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 197 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 123 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 91 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core i5-7600K LGA 1151 Desktop Processors (BX80677I57600K)
Buy for CA$235.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i5-7600K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
72.19641672196417%
Multi-Core
3898
92.23852342640795%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
