Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 354 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 128 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 91 vs 140 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
